I've just had my first go at using R to create a blog post - a pretty pleasing process, actually. I take some previously harvested distance data and... oh, go read about it over there.
Why is it that they think every paper which strengthens the case for global warming is some kind of fraud, but every paper which they think weakens the case is some kind of "bombshell"?
Recent comments
21 weeks 6 days ago
2 years 12 weeks ago
2 years 12 weeks ago
2 years 14 weeks ago
2 years 15 weeks ago
2 years 15 weeks ago
3 years 12 weeks ago
3 years 36 weeks ago
3 years 36 weeks ago
3 years 38 weeks ago